Entertainment
Icon Separator

West End Club

Maven Plan provides on-going planning advice to a number of high profile internationally recognised groups and individuals with late night entertainment interests.

At present we are carrying out planning due diligence on potential London city centre venues in excess of 800sqm that are unique and considered by the client to be suitable for the introduction and implementation of the landmark nightclub and restaurant of an international standard.  The planning case presented would demonstrate compliance with the relevant policies but also propose restrictive conditions and tight controls on the management of the venue.

The club will attract billionaires and the most renowned names in the worlds of fashion, sport entertainment and business.

| more
Icon Separator

Public

Planning permission was secured for the 100% increase in floorspace and relocation of the existing well know Crazy Larry’s nightclub in Chelsea from the first floor to the basement.

The application submission overcame policy objection to the loss of the existing retail floorspace by proposing a Grampian condition solution.

We advised, co-ordinated and prepared a robust case in support of the application which included an acoustic report, transport statement, management plan and planning support statement.  Notwithstanding the considerable local opposition, the Council accepted, as a result of the evidence presented, that the proposed use would not result in harmful levels of associated noise and disturbance.

The new club is trading as Public.

| more
Icon Separator

Portland Place

Maven Plan was engaged by Lord Edward Davenport, the owner of 33 Portland Place, to represent his interests during High Court Injunction proceedings into the unauthorised use of his property for a range of commercial activities, including celebrity parties, film shoots and hospitality events.

We provided expert evidence to the High Court in respect of the alleged illegal use, arguing that the activities were ancillary to the primary residential use of the property and consistent with its long history as a grand residence.

Although the Judge upheld the Injunction proceedings, the planning merits of the case were set aside as a matter for further consideration as part of a revised planning application.

| more